In Reply to: Wow, where the begin. posted by Captain Hindsight on 2012-06-23 15:14:39
"It's substance over party."
-You must get off on lying or something. You have proven time and time again that this is just so untrue it makes me sick. And somehow you've managed to convince yourself that you're substance over party? Fuck. Brainwashed much?
What party is generally providing the substance? The GOP. I rest my case there.
"When it comes to compromise, fine, but you don't compromise you principles"
-I know this isnt your style, but can you provide me even 1 example of where I have ever been uncompromising in an instance I knew I was wrong. I rarely post on this board, mostly just read, so LOL at your baseless staetment. Which seems to be your forte.
LOL! Dude, we're not even talking about you. We're talking about politicians getting together and compromising just for the sake of it, to make Congress "look good", like they're getting stuff done for the good of the people. If you (a Senator or Congressman) compromise your principles, then you have gone against yourself and your constituents.
"Not sure where you get this "racist" crap from. That's usually the signal that the person you're talking to has no rebuttal so just resorts to insults like racism. Gets pretty damned old."
- This would be a decent point.. IF you actually said something I was rebutting? you made no statement in your post that needed rebutting. But the point remains, you're a racist. Proved it when you dissapeared after Obama captured Bin Laden. Also managed to prove at the same time that you are not substance over party.
WTF? Do you even read your posts before you press the button? You called me a racist and I responded. Learn to read. And, what the bloody hell does not responding immediately to the killing of OBL have anything at all to do with race? I feel like I'm arguing with a middle schooler.
And to your last "point".. I sure as fuck hope you're not trying to say that gay marriage would not be progressive for our country. And then comparing it to electing a black president as evidence that it may not be progressive! HAHA! You can't truely believe half the things you say, right?
Yes, gay marriage would not be considered progress. Change is not always progress. Do you not understand the difference? Sure doesn't sound like it.
Then, YOU bring up the fact that the President is black (half anyway), not me, and somehow try and equate that to the fact that I was talking about change not being equivalent to progress, as Mister hope and CHANGE in the White House demonstrates.
So you see, you're not only retarded and unable to debate, you brought up race because you are unable to argue your points. You perfectly illustrated my point about liberals being the ones consumed by race and the differences between people.
Go to sleep old man
No, I think I'll go out and have some fun. Maybe you should see someone though for your "condition".
--------------------------------
"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." -Thomas Paine
The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."