contact | profile | register | prefs | faq | logout


[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Politics ]
I don't need help
User account number (aid):
10550 Site Supporter
Posted by underdog on 2012-04-20 17:57:30

In Reply to: Underdog... re: the Forbes article you posted below... posted by shikantaza on 2012-04-20 11:20:17

watch this. he explains that most atmospheric CO2 comes from natural sources. he runs through how the cycles actually work, the delays... what you call 'sensitivity'

btw, your entire "senstivity is linear" line rings my bullshit detector. big time. It comes across as your excuse why predictions made by alarmists 20 years ago have not remotely come about

what appears to happen is heat causes CO2 to break from ground water. some atmospheric CO2 comes from heat- NOT THE OTHER WAY AROUND ONLY.

this is why the PPM from 1860 is like that, why it has not driven temperature. the temperature (emerging out of an ice age) has driven the PPM.

a huge chunk of your causation is backwards. ASFAIK

PS. the science is NOT SETTLED



Thread:

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

Login with existing account
Create a new account

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Politics ]