In Reply to: Ummm, that was just a single person complaining about posted by gsw_hoops on 2012-04-04 10:45:02

• This is what conservatives have come to...   -  shikantaza  2012-04-04 09:57:55 (113 views)
• This court is going to cook up legalese to justify overturning it purely on an ideological basis.  -  Dick Nikon  2012-04-04 11:40:05 (79 views)
• I don't think you need to cook up legalese  -  Shallow Hal  2012-04-04 21:58:25 (51 views)
• It will be inconsistent with prior positions taken by the conservative wings.  -  Earl j. Slick  2012-04-05 10:31:26 (44 views)
• If cases are a slam dunk they don't make it to the SC.  -  Dick Nikon  2012-04-05 01:02:36 (47 views)
• forget the fact that he cited something not even in the bill.. SCALIA KNOCKED IT OUT OF THE PARK!   -  jtown  2012-04-04 13:28:59 (41 views)
• And juuuuust foul...   -  nomad  2012-04-04 14:29:51 (37 views)
• Already making excuses I see. They should just ignore  -  gsw_hoops  2012-04-04 12:29:20 (55 views)
• lol it's judicial activism only when it's your side. i see. lol you're sad   -  jtown  2012-04-04 13:18:16 (45 views)
• There is a good point in this  -  Flashfire  2012-04-04 12:00:15 (64 views)
• Ummm, that was just a single person complaining about  -  gsw_hoops  2012-04-04 10:45:02 (73 views)
• In vacationing Earl's absence let me just say "Fuck you".   -  BackseatGM  2012-04-04 10:58:11 (47 views)
• Thank you.   -  Earl j. Slick  2012-04-09 17:45:54 (33 views)
• JUST A YAHOO!   -  Flashfire  2012-04-04 10:47:25 (53 views)
• Whom all millions of Conservatives nominated to speak for us.  -  gsw_hoops  2012-04-04 10:54:44 (63 views)