In Reply to: No! He's implying that it's not their job to read the entire thing! posted by gsw_hoops on 2012-03-28 18:35:25

• I know you'll be stunned, but Antonin Scalia lives in the past   -  CARTIERFROHAWK  2012-03-28 17:17:19 (73 views)
• Seems he's implying they should make decisions on things they haven't read.  -  nomad  2012-03-28 18:16:02 (43 views)
• No! He's implying that it's not their job to read the entire thing!  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 18:35:25 (41 views)
• Thought they were deciding on more than just the mandate - but I haven't been following it that much   -  nomad  2012-03-28 21:28:45 (29 views)
• He kicked ass today. That's all I need to know.  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 17:24:14 (53 views)
• you root for your RW ideology like some demented sports fan. it's bizarre.   -  jtown  2012-03-28 17:42:12 (37 views)
• I root for upholding the Constitution, whereas you are  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 17:48:02 (43 views)
• If that term is accurate in describing anyone on this site, its clearly you  -  Hoser  2012-03-28 17:55:50 (45 views)
• 'i was listening to the past 2h of Levin and he said etc etc etc'  -  jtown  2012-03-28 18:03:46 (43 views)
• So you dont care about facts? lol   -  Hoser  2012-03-28 17:34:59 (34 views)
• What facts did I ignore? Oh, that's right. You couldn't possibly  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 17:47:00 (39 views)
• The fact that he was arguing against something not in the health care law?  -  Hoser  2012-03-28 17:54:14 (45 views)
• He was arguing against the mandate, the ever-reaching  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 18:13:22 (42 views)
• you are, obviously, actively hallucinating   -  CARTIERFROHAWK  2012-03-28 19:22:28 (30 views)
• Umm, I'm sure that you can find and listen to the hearings  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 19:26:52 (31 views)
• again, he referenced something not in the law. it's cool.. don't let the facts get in the way, pal.  -  jtown  2012-03-28 18:25:21 (39 views)
• A incorrect reference in a 2700-page bill (that doesn't  -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 18:32:47 (45 views)
• what exactly are you arguing? lol  -  blue  2012-03-28 19:07:21 (46 views)
• yet again, don't let the facts get in the way. it's only the Supreme Court. good soundbyte tho bro!   -  jtown  2012-03-28 18:38:13 (31 views)
• Got it. You got nothing.   -  gsw_hoops  2012-03-28 19:21:42 (29 views)
• a SC justice cites something not even in the bill and you're like 'meh' because he's a GOP guy.  -  jtown  2012-03-28 23:07:52 (38 views)