warriorsworld.net | Golden State Warriors Forum: I root for upholding the Constitution, whereas you are

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Politics ]

I root for upholding the Constitution, whereas you are
User account number (aid): 51 Site Supporter
Posted by gsw_hoops on 2012-03-28 17:48:02

In Reply to: you root for your RW ideology like some demented sports fan. it's bizarre. posted by jtown on 2012-03-28 17:42:12

just a cum-catcher for whatever the President throws your way.

--------------------------------
"Moderation in temper is always a virtue; but moderation in principle is always a vice." -Thomas Paine

The Constitution is not an instrument for the government to restrain the people, it is an instrument for the people to restrain the government."

Patrick Henry

Thread:

I know you'll be stunned, but Antonin Scalia lives in the past - CARTIERFROHAWK 2012-03-28 17:17:19 (73 views)

Seems he's implying they should make decisions on things they haven't read. - nomad 2012-03-28 18:16:02 (43 views)

No! He's implying that it's not their job to read the entire thing! - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 18:35:25 (41 views)

Thought they were deciding on more than just the mandate - but I haven't been following it that much - nomad 2012-03-28 21:28:45 (28 views)

He kicked ass today. That's all I need to know. - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 17:24:14 (53 views)

you root for your RW ideology like some demented sports fan. it's bizarre. - jtown 2012-03-28 17:42:12 (37 views)

I root for upholding the Constitution, whereas you are - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 17:48:02 (43 views)

If that term is accurate in describing anyone on this site, its clearly you - Hoser 2012-03-28 17:55:50 (45 views)

'i was listening to the past 2h of Levin and he said etc etc etc' - jtown 2012-03-28 18:03:46 (43 views)

So you dont care about facts? lol - Hoser 2012-03-28 17:34:59 (34 views)

What facts did I ignore? Oh, that's right. You couldn't possibly - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 17:47:00 (39 views)

The fact that he was arguing against something not in the health care law? - Hoser 2012-03-28 17:54:14 (45 views)

He was arguing against the mandate, the ever-reaching - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 18:13:22 (42 views)

you are, obviously, actively hallucinating - CARTIERFROHAWK 2012-03-28 19:22:28 (30 views)

Umm, I'm sure that you can find and listen to the hearings - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 19:26:52 (31 views)

again, he referenced something not in the law. it's cool.. don't let the facts get in the way, pal. - jtown 2012-03-28 18:25:21 (39 views)

A incorrect reference in a 2700-page bill (that doesn't - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 18:32:47 (45 views)

what exactly are you arguing? lol - blue 2012-03-28 19:07:21 (46 views)

yet again, don't let the facts get in the way. it's only the Supreme Court. good soundbyte tho bro! - jtown 2012-03-28 18:38:13 (31 views)

Got it. You got nothing. - gsw_hoops 2012-03-28 19:21:42 (29 views)

a SC justice cites something not even in the bill and you're like 'meh' because he's a GOP guy. - jtown 2012-03-28 23:07:52 (38 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Politics ]