In Reply to: dunno, why is the fact that Chesapeake is an investment conduit something bad about fracking? posted by DC Warrior on 2012-03-07 11:57:32

• Article on fracking/natural gas/scam   -  Earl j. Slick  2012-03-07 11:41:51 (56 views)
• Response to article   -  Earl j. Slick  2012-03-07 11:43:09 (50 views)
• And the rebuttal to the response.   -  Earl j. Slick  2012-03-07 11:44:04 (52 views)
• dunno, why is the fact that Chesapeake is an investment conduit something bad about fracking?  -  DC Warrior  2012-03-07 11:57:32 (51 views)
• Isn't the argument basically that it's all hype?  -  nomad  2012-03-07 12:14:12 (50 views)
• that's his argument.  -  DC Warrior  2012-03-07 12:36:23 (42 views)
• If he's right it's not just speculation, it's more like securities fraud.  -  Earl j. Slick  2012-03-07 14:52:21 (37 views)
• It's the equivalent of a right-winger going off on Fannie and Freddie  -  DC Warrior  2012-03-07 15:34:43 (36 views)
• Right wingers LOVED Fannie and Freddie when they were investor darlings  -  Dick Nikon  2012-03-07 16:45:49 (31 views)
• But, natural gas *is* booming now.   -  nate  2012-03-07 12:26:21 (38 views)
• But for how long?  -  nomad  2012-03-07 15:37:02 (31 views)
• Good points.   -  nate  2012-03-08 09:37:29 (22 views)
• how important is that 100 years? I think it's not important at all  -  DC Warrior  2012-03-08 05:49:49 (31 views)
• LNG transport limitations prevent a stake in coal worldwide.  -  Dick Nikon  2012-03-08 12:44:38 (24 views)
• The 100 years become important, imo, when we weigh environmental tradeoffs  -  nate  2012-03-08 09:36:57 (25 views)
• why, if this is a stopgap on the way to alternative energy?  -  DC Warrior  2012-03-08 09:47:43 (22 views)
• I dunno, it seems like there are some big environmental questions for a stopgap  -  nate  2012-03-08 14:12:19 (21 views)