In Reply to: Interesting to see Bargnani at #2. Seems counter to those ripping him on WW.net. posted by statsman on 2013-02-20 09:07:33

• David Lee, ouch   -  Flashfire  2013-02-20 09:04:17 (308 views)
• MicroAnalysis.   -  alonzo  2013-02-20 09:35:00 (31 views)
• Good stuff   -  Retired Season Ticket Holder  2013-02-20 09:22:07 (25 views)
• Just goes to show that statistics don't tell the whole story  -  Shallow Hal  2013-02-20 09:16:48 (80 views)
• if you look at the first list on there, he isn't even listed for defending within 5 feet of rim.  -  King Cohan  2013-02-20 09:24:47 (57 views)
• that is a great piece   -  King Cohan  2013-02-20 09:16:33 (22 views)
• Interesting to see Bargnani at #2. Seems counter to those ripping him on WW.net.   -  statsman  2013-02-20 09:07:33 (40 views)
• yep. still try Bogut/Rush or Jenkins for Bargnani/Fields or Ross  -  gsw_pride  2013-02-20 11:12:10 (19 views)
• i think it explains a couple types of defense  -  gswfan4ever  2013-02-20 09:13:25 (58 views)
• You might be able to get a sense of it from pages 9 & 10  -  Flashfire  2013-02-20 09:23:50 (52 views)
• i think you are right. good points. Do you want invisible defender or defender who never shows up?   -  King Cohan  2013-02-20 09:41:22 (26 views)
• The part that's tough for me to wrap my head around is this  -  Flashfire  2013-02-20 09:48:56 (49 views)
• i don't think it takes opp position into account at all. you raise good questions though.   -  King Cohan  2013-02-20 10:34:10 (15 views)
• Yeah, this is really interesting stuff   -  Flashfire  2013-02-20 09:10:24 (29 views)