warriorsworld.net | Golden State Warriors Forum: so at his worst...

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]

so at his worst...
User account number (aid): 1533 Site Supporter
Posted by SHAUNsense on 2013-01-24 13:15:17

In Reply to: anyone still want to debate me that a completely healthy Bogut is better than this new Dwight Howard posted by Warriors in 2014 on 2013-01-24 13:07:00

DHO is averaging 17/12 on 56% shooting, and 2.5 blocks per game.

Bogut's BEST year was 09/10 when he averaged 16/10 on 52% shooting and 2.5 blocks.

So no, Bogut at his healthiest (and he only played 69 games that year...so it's more like at his BEST not "healthiest") is still not better than this year's Dwight, where he is struggling through a ton of injuries.

So 2012 Howard > Bogut from any year in his career.

Thread:

anyone still want to debate me that a completely healthy Bogut is better than this new Dwight Howard - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:07:00 (108 views)

We don't want to debate you, we just want to slap you. And you continue to be incapable of - BackseatGM 2013-01-24 15:53:10 (11 views)

quite possibly your most pointless post ever. - I am not Joe Lacob 2013-01-24 15:38:02 (4 views)

Dwight, in the right system, is the best center in the league - San Ramon Warrior 2013-01-24 13:35:03 (43 views)

exactly - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:59:02 (3 views)

so at his worst... - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:15:17 (59 views)

exactly my point. Lakers would be better or equal with Festus at center. Stats are relatively - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:19:49 (31 views)

"Lakers would be better or equal with Festus at center." - statsman 2013-01-24 13:22:06 (31 views)

Not pimping Festus at all. Just saying that Lakers record would be just as good with almost anyone - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:31:01 (18 views)

His health is one factor, the coach/system is the other - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:37:27 (16 views)

This is a pointless debate - Flashfire 2013-01-24 13:11:30 (57 views)

again, fair enough but that was my original premise which was argued - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:16:28 (29 views)

I called the original premise faulty as well, which you could go back and see for yourself - Flashfire 2013-01-24 14:03:23 (4 views)

dwight never impressed me...no offensive game...bottom bottom teir of "superstars" - BC 2013-01-24 13:10:04 (15 views)

a completely healthy bogut at this point might never happen again - rick barry's rug 2013-01-24 13:09:53 (33 views)

agree. but Bogut from 2-3 years ago was WAY better than this Dwight Howard - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:10:29 (18 views)

a 2-3 yr ago dwight was way better than a 2-3yr ago bogut too - Promise 2013-01-24 13:13:29 (32 views)

agree but again my original premise was understood and still debated - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:21:19 (21 views)

And Dwight Howard pre-2013 was WAY better than Bogut 2-3 years ago - Flashfire 2013-01-24 13:12:38 (29 views)

Pretty hard to say that when Bogut hasn't played in a century - Faceless 2013-01-24 13:09:34 (25 views)

how come bogut gets his "prime" yrs, but howard only gets 2013? - Promise 2013-01-24 13:08:05 (42 views)

fair question. but that was my original premise and got roasted for it - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:12:17 (19 views)

He and the anti-Howard crowd still haven't defined "100% Bogut". - statsman 2013-01-24 13:11:35 (30 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]