so at his worst...

DHO is averaging 17/12 on 56% shooting, and 2.5 blocks per game.

Bogut's BEST year was 09/10 when he averaged 16/10 on 52% shooting and 2.5 blocks.

So no, Bogut at his healthiest (and he only played 69 games that it's more like at his BEST not "healthiest") is still not better than this year's Dwight, where he is struggling through a ton of injuries.

So 2012 Howard > Bogut from any year in his career.
Posted by: SHAUNsense (1533) on 13-01-24 05:15:17 | Advertiser
In Reply to: anyone still want to debate me that a completely healthy Bogut is better than this new Dwight Howard posted by Warriors in 2014 on 13-01-24 05:07:00

Post Follow Up

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option: