warriorsworld.net | Golden State Warriors Forum: He and the anti-Howard crowd still haven't defined "100% Bogut".

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]

He and the anti-Howard crowd still haven't defined "100% Bogut".
User account number (aid): 10936 Site Supporter
Posted by statsman on 2013-01-24 13:11:35

In Reply to: how come bogut gets his "prime" yrs, but howard only gets 2013? posted by Promise on 2013-01-24 13:08:05

None answer the issue of it being five years since Bogut played at least 70 games in a season, and he's only done that twice in his eight year career. Also, it's been five years (2007-08) since Bogut has played the final week of a regular season.

Define "100% Bogut".

Thread:

anyone still want to debate me that a completely healthy Bogut is better than this new Dwight Howard - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:07:00 (106 views)

We don't want to debate you, we just want to slap you. And you continue to be incapable of - BackseatGM 2013-01-24 15:53:10 (11 views)

quite possibly your most pointless post ever. - I am not Joe Lacob 2013-01-24 15:38:02 (4 views)

Dwight, in the right system, is the best center in the league - San Ramon Warrior 2013-01-24 13:35:03 (43 views)

exactly - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:59:02 (3 views)

so at his worst... - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:15:17 (58 views)

exactly my point. Lakers would be better or equal with Festus at center. Stats are relatively - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:19:49 (31 views)

"Lakers would be better or equal with Festus at center." - statsman 2013-01-24 13:22:06 (31 views)

Not pimping Festus at all. Just saying that Lakers record would be just as good with almost anyone - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:31:01 (18 views)

His health is one factor, the coach/system is the other - SHAUNsense 2013-01-24 13:37:27 (16 views)

This is a pointless debate - Flashfire 2013-01-24 13:11:30 (57 views)

again, fair enough but that was my original premise which was argued - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:16:28 (29 views)

I called the original premise faulty as well, which you could go back and see for yourself - Flashfire 2013-01-24 14:03:23 (4 views)

dwight never impressed me...no offensive game...bottom bottom teir of "superstars" - BC 2013-01-24 13:10:04 (14 views)

a completely healthy bogut at this point might never happen again - rick barry's rug 2013-01-24 13:09:53 (33 views)

agree. but Bogut from 2-3 years ago was WAY better than this Dwight Howard - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:10:29 (17 views)

a 2-3 yr ago dwight was way better than a 2-3yr ago bogut too - Promise 2013-01-24 13:13:29 (32 views)

agree but again my original premise was understood and still debated - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:21:19 (21 views)

And Dwight Howard pre-2013 was WAY better than Bogut 2-3 years ago - Flashfire 2013-01-24 13:12:38 (29 views)

Pretty hard to say that when Bogut hasn't played in a century - Faceless 2013-01-24 13:09:34 (25 views)

how come bogut gets his "prime" yrs, but howard only gets 2013? - Promise 2013-01-24 13:08:05 (42 views)

fair question. but that was my original premise and got roasted for it - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-24 13:12:17 (18 views)

He and the anti-Howard crowd still haven't defined "100% Bogut". - statsman 2013-01-24 13:11:35 (30 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]