In Reply to: Re: Yes, I'm aware that a trade won't happen till 'right up to it'. posted by E-Doh (formerly E-Damp) on 2013-01-09 16:16:52

• One question, two different scenarios  -  JamesKrygan  2013-01-09 15:43:11 (103 views)
• 1) a few quality vets, with Pierce being the bare minimum option  -  PNQ  2013-01-09 18:25:08 (13 views)
• do you want the whole list?  -  one flap down  2013-01-09 17:05:30 (14 views)
• Same answer for both, I don't trade him unless I can get a stud back and that is unlikely to happen.   -  U-Trains #116  2013-01-09 16:20:46 (25 views)
• Yeah, honestly, I don't see that trade out there either.   -  JamesKrygan  2013-01-09 16:54:33 (8 views)
• Yep. You consider it only if it nets you a star that will commit long-term to being a Warrior.  -  Faceless  2013-01-09 16:48:27 (14 views)
• nothing is going to happen for awhile...not till right up to it...after we've seen/kno a bit more...   -  BC  2013-01-09 15:48:47 (23 views)
• Yes, I'm aware that a trade won't happen till 'right up to it'.  -  JamesKrygan  2013-01-09 15:54:20 (27 views)
• Re: Yes, I'm aware that a trade won't happen till 'right up to it'.  -  E-Doh (formerly E-Damp)  2013-01-09 16:16:52 (24 views)
• LOL...we can' deal Beans now... and who wants two SFs...   -  BC  2013-01-09 16:19:30 (19 views)
• I didn't say there were any deals out there...  -  E-Doh (formerly E-Damp)  2013-01-09 16:24:17 (23 views)
• it being the trade deadline...guess i left that out...   -  BC  2013-01-09 16:01:20 (18 views)