warriorsworld.net | Golden State Warriors Forum: Depends on where you view the team is as a contender

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]

Depends on where you view the team is as a contender
User account number (aid): 44 Site Supporter
Posted by New Warriors on 2013-01-09 09:17:29

In Reply to: Why would we want Gay? posted by The Maestro on 2013-01-09 08:54:10

Which is hard to decipher without Bogut.

But, if you think he's coming back, and you think Gay could be the key piece, you consider it.

The reality is this team likely lose some or all of Jack, Landry and Malone this offseason. If you got a shot to do some things, you take it while you can IMO

Thread:

If the Ws are willing to swap Barnes for Gay, they should talk to Atlanta - heathcliff 2013-01-09 08:50:10 (249 views)

I wouldn't trade Barnes for Gay and that contract. - Bopper 2013-01-09 10:57:24 (40 views)

his sf warriors jersey would be a flaming hot seller - gsw_pride 2013-01-09 10:49:10 (35 views)

Barnes for Gay is moronic IMO. Barnes is already as good as Gay overall - Warriors in 2014 2013-01-09 10:14:01 (84 views)

LOL no he isn't - toolegit99 2013-01-09 13:17:29 (21 views)

look, I am a big Barnes fan but have to admit that is LOL, for you to suggest Barnes is as good. - Firehouse 2013-01-09 11:14:09 (38 views)

What does Gay do besides score not very efficiently? - Bopper 2013-01-09 11:18:33 (21 views)

I don't think that there's much of an argument for Gay not being ahead of Barnes offensively - Faceless 2013-01-09 10:24:52 (70 views)

Barnes works so much harder defensively than I ever imagined he would out of college - gsfanatic1 2013-01-09 10:34:32 (51 views)

Agree with you, though Gay is only 26. (In comparison Lee is finding his prime at 28) - Psyched 2013-01-09 10:28:52 (42 views)

This. Barnes has far higher upside, Gay is a known quantity with no more upside IMO... - playmaker 2013-01-09 10:26:14 (28 views)

Homer post of the day - Sebby 2013-01-09 10:14:57 (33 views)

Gay's advanced stats are all terrible, though. - live 2013-01-09 10:34:37 (47 views)

Dude. Look at his username. - endlessraine 2013-01-09 10:16:12 (23 views)

keep hb. - dubalicious 2013-01-09 09:48:09 (27 views)

SF is not a position we need to improve at tbh - Sebby 2013-01-09 09:37:01 (55 views)

Why would we want Gay? - The Maestro 2013-01-09 08:54:10 (112 views)

Depends on where you view the team is as a contender - New Warriors 2013-01-09 09:17:29 (72 views)

Losing Landry shouldn't be a concern... - Rox 2013-01-09 09:41:34 (60 views)

It's simple, if Bogut doesn't come back this team doesn't contend - Faceless 2013-01-09 09:21:19 (58 views)

If Bogut comes back, they likely go farther with Gay than Barnes - New Warriors 2013-01-09 09:25:48 (55 views)

I will take an all around rookie with a high ceiling over a one year bandaid - Faceless 2013-01-09 09:28:33 (70 views)

this - Sebby 2013-01-09 10:16:10 (23 views)

That's Gay! - Mel 2013-01-09 09:17:29 (30 views)

It comes down to whether or not you believe Gay can be that go-to guy/shot creator - JamesKrygan 2013-01-09 09:08:45 (54 views)

I don't get how everyone wants to trade away Barnes' all around upside - Faceless 2013-01-09 09:00:23 (68 views)

I agree; at this point, Gay and his big contract isn't worth risking - SFbaybum 2013-01-09 08:56:24 (67 views)

The chemistry point needs to be highlighted - Faceless 2013-01-09 09:30:28 (50 views)

+1 better to see how we develop w/ Barnes and Bogut, etc - The Stranger 2013-01-09 09:27:13 (31 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]