In Reply to: Is keeping Baze and Tyler this season worth losing Jack and or Landry next??? posted by stimpson on 2013-01-05 11:48:29

• Is keeping Baze and Tyler this season worth losing Jack and or Landry next???  -  stimpson  2013-01-05 11:48:29 (487 views)
• Basically...GSW will have low $ guys in the last spots and Jenkins,Baze,Tyler probably are as good  -  rem rehab  2013-01-05 13:42:38 (80 views)
• Big Rebounder is right on...we can keep Jack either way. I'd say keep Jack and Baze and use MLE on  -  Warriors in 2014  2013-01-05 12:50:32 (108 views)
• Jack is going to want to get PAID  -  Faceless  2013-01-05 12:56:34 (67 views)
• I think teams will jump at Landry more and I think Jack is the guy you bring back.  -  Run BJM  2013-01-05 13:29:23 (62 views)
• I agree that Jack is the more important signing, but  -  Faceless  2013-01-05 14:11:20 (66 views)
• I think the new CBA is making teams a little more frugal with non-stars. If he gets 6 mil/year  -  Run BJM  2013-01-05 14:18:02 (54 views)
• match any offer ftw!   -  WsFTLOL  2013-01-05 13:25:07 (50 views)
• yup, +1...   -  BC  2013-01-05 13:28:36 (48 views)
• what about that thing about the revenue going up and thus the tax going up?   -  BC  2013-01-05 12:10:32 (56 views)
• That's bad info. Next year's MLE has nothing to do with this year.   -  Needle Mover  2013-01-05 12:07:24 (78 views)
• not an expert on the CBA  -  Meyer Lemon  2013-01-05 12:07:05 (73 views)
• None really. Smaller MLE, can't sign-and-trade are the big one.   -  Da Bear  2013-01-05 14:39:11 (51 views)
• Jack was gotten via trade, we have his bird rights.   -  The Big Rebounder  2013-01-05 11:59:43 (53 views)
• Are you sure about that? Hope so but the issue remains the same for Landry   -  stimpson  2013-01-05 12:02:37 (60 views)
• many people seem to think he is replaceable...???; i don't think so... // what does KB & JT have  -  BC  2013-01-05 12:07:52 (77 views)
• He signed a 4 year contract with Toronto in the 2009-10 season  -  The Big Rebounder  2013-01-05 12:06:05 (114 views)