He would have been cut or traded for another expiring vet.

Bottom line, Warriors took on RJ's contract for a late 1st Round pick (Ezeli) in fear of not having a 1st rd pick.

Question is, was RJ's contract and his ramifications on their salary cap leverage worth Ezeli? Right now I would say no to be honest, as Ezeli doesn't look like much other than a big body.

They probably should have just traded Jackson for an expiring stiff big man.
Posted by: Vonteego (11328) on 13-01-03 13:21:54
In Reply to: if Myers didn't trade Stephen Jackson to the Spurs, minus Festus, would he have been a cancer posted by lebron'sbaby on 13-01-03 12:37:21

Post Follow Up

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option: