No they wanted to get rid of Monta because he and Curry would have never worked and they had Klay

waiting in the wings. Plus nothing at C. Keep Monta and there would be no Barnes, no Ezeli, Klay and Curry would be sulking all while Monta jacked up 20+ shots per night and the W's continued to lose.

Last I checked we had a winning record without virtually no contribution from Bogut. Addition by subtraction is what I would call it.
Posted by: U-Trains #116 (15553) on 12-11-28 22:30:48
In Reply to: I'm guessing they knew about the severity of Boguts injury and it just shows how badly they wanted posted by stimpson on 12-11-28 21:49:03

Post Follow Up

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option: