In Reply to: cavs are not absorbing 40M for the #7. posted by gogswarriors on 2012-06-20 00:13:07

• W's interested in Varejao?   -  Stevie  2012-06-19 23:40:18 (682 views)
• Hell yes... thatd be a great deal. Varejao is one of the better, more underrated bigs in the league  -  PNQ  2012-06-20 10:52:00 (16 views)
• It says the Cavs are the ones hesitating to pull the trigger.. i sure hope this means the dubs are  -  INSANE in the MEMBRANE  2012-06-20 08:39:08 (53 views)
• Varejao could not return from his injured right wrist and you're locked into him for next three yrs  -  jason bourne  2012-06-20 06:53:42 (34 views)
• If Ws roll the dice on that, then Cavs have to take both Jefferson's and Beans' contracts   -  jason bourne  2012-06-20 06:58:04 (15 views)
• Why do you care about AB and Jefferson deals? They are expiring after next year.   -  gsfanatic1  2012-06-20 07:37:56 (11 views)
• Both Jefferson and AB deals have player options after that  -  jason bourne  2012-06-20 12:06:56 (17 views)
• Side note. If the Cavs are thinking about dealing Varejao then they are seriously considering  -  U-Trains #116  2012-06-20 02:17:08 (113 views)
• Beans and #7 for Verajoa and #24 I would do if nobody from the top 6 drop.  -  U-Trains #116  2012-06-20 02:08:05 (46 views)
• Coming off an injury and turning 30 in september? I like him, but pass   -  waazup  2012-06-20 00:25:52 (18 views)
• I like Varejao, but I don't think with his injury issues he's worth a 17 spot drop  -  whack jack  2012-06-20 00:20:15 (37 views)
• Beans and Varejao/24 for those who have problems with this shit   -  buzz  2012-06-20 00:14:42 (49 views)
• It should be Jefferson. His contract is worse than Beans   -  jason bourne  2012-06-20 07:15:38 (13 views)
• so #7 and Andris for #24 and Varejao?   -  endlessraine  2012-06-20 00:06:35 (26 views)
• No I believe it would be 7, AB and Jefferson for 24 and Varejao.  -  stimpson  2012-06-20 00:10:16 (40 views)
• cavs are not absorbing 40M for the #7.   -  gogswarriors  2012-06-20 00:13:07 (22 views)
• Varejao makes almost the same as AB so it's only absorbing Jefferson  -  stimpson  2012-06-20 00:18:46 (31 views)
• not sure but i doubt we get them to take both.   -  gogswarriors  2012-06-20 00:24:53 (19 views)
• I agree...but one can dream.   -  stimpson  2012-06-20 00:25:59 (20 views)
• interesting, can't imagine the Cavs would take both AB and Jefferson but wth.  -  stimpson  2012-06-20 00:02:25 (44 views)
• I don't see that happening since Varejao is due 8.4M next year. I'm okay with the trade if the W's  -  kali warrior  2012-06-19 23:47:54 (67 views)
• salary doesn't match up.   -  endlessraine  2012-06-20 00:07:35 (23 views)
• don't have to as the Cavs are way under the cap.   -  stimpson  2012-06-20 00:12:15 (25 views)
• if thats the case, GSW can also throw in the 2 second rounders to sweeten the deal. lol.   -  endlessraine  2012-06-20 00:51:50 (16 views)
• we are dumping a ton of salary. not going to happen plus why do we need to unload salary all of a  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-19 23:50:08 (43 views)
• LOL no wai.. hey how about #4 for #7 and we absorb your side show bob?   -  gswfan4ever  2012-06-19 23:46:28 (33 views)
• he was a double double last year. thats pretty good.  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-19 23:48:06 (39 views)
• varejao is servicable. if drummond isnt there i guess. not in love with the trade though  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-19 23:46:02 (44 views)
• 24th pick = gold mine. possibly there: white, qmiller, melo, ezeli, nicholson, sully   -  Steven  2012-06-19 23:45:35 (28 views)
• If we got Varejao we'd not add a big man. I'd love Q-Miller or White though.   -  whack jack  2012-06-20 00:22:04 (19 views)