In Reply to: Although some might argue that Lamb belongs in the 2nd Tier. I wouldn't mind taking him at #7. posted by Pointman on 2012-06-15 21:27:00

• why are people suggesting trading down for multiple mid-late 1st. we have 4 draft picks already  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-15 20:47:41 (87 views)
• Not all people really THINK before they post.  -  rem rehab  2012-06-15 22:20:07 (45 views)
• Some feel that all the players in the 7 to 17 range are crapshoots  -  The Big Rebounder  2012-06-15 22:07:32 (29 views)
• Look at the mock drafts and look at where the 3rd tier starts and ends.  -  Pointman  2012-06-15 21:18:23 (88 views)
• Rather Leonard at 14 and PJ3 at 16 (or Harkless). May need to trade up to 11-12 for Leonard   -  maxsmart  2012-06-16 01:12:42 (30 views)
• True, prospects so young it's tough to know who will be better. So get two chances at 14 & 16   -  maxsmart  2012-06-15 23:31:26 (21 views)
• One of the top 6 will drop to #7. Sullinger will be available and Pistons will try to trade   -  loozballs  2012-06-15 21:28:19 (28 views)
• Although some might argue that Lamb belongs in the 2nd Tier. I wouldn't mind taking him at #7.   -  Pointman  2012-06-15 21:27:00 (29 views)
• lamb will be a decent pro no doubt. i just dont see how our defense will last. all we have is bogut   -  gogswarriors  2012-06-15 21:35:58 (19 views)
• so now you're back to drafting for need.   -  Retired Tank Commander  2012-06-15 21:37:03 (22 views)
• did i say to draft him? no! i said hell be a decent pro.   -  gogswarriors  2012-06-15 22:06:07 (17 views)
• That crash and burn UConn did when he was given the keys gives me pause  -  New Warriors  2012-06-15 22:08:17 (25 views)
• Would take Henson, Sullinger or even Lillard over those two guys   -  New Warriors  2012-06-15 21:25:17 (21 views)
• And there's a good chance one or both could be there at 14.   -  Pointman  2012-06-15 21:28:27 (18 views)
• Incredibly slim, so why risk it? An extra rookie when they don't even want all the picks they got?   -  New Warriors  2012-06-15 21:29:59 (20 views)
• If needed, kick in $3 mil plus 2nd rd pick to move up from 14 to 10, 11 or 12   -  maxsmart  2012-06-15 23:38:24 (17 views)
• They're trading 2 rookies for 2 rookies. They may love TJones or Harkless and expect them to be...  -  Pointman  2012-06-15 21:55:12 (27 views)
• If they love a guy, take them at 7.  -  New Warriors  2012-06-15 22:06:34 (19 views)
• no idea. this isn't the nfl   -  Lawston  2012-06-15 20:56:16 (19 views)
• the only suggestion is 7 and 30 for 14 and 16.  -  endlessraine  2012-06-15 20:52:45 (33 views)
• dude you have any idea about value of picks? i dont trade the 7 alone for 14 and 16.  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-15 20:53:40 (50 views)
• youll have a tough time being a gm. but then again, youre not.   -  endlessraine  2012-06-16 01:23:53 (16 views)
• I would in THIS draft, but in almost every other draft I agree with your thinking.   -  Tom Vu  2012-06-15 21:01:32 (27 views)
• agreed. that "third tier" has some great potential... think of it this way...  -  Next Generation, Silicon Valley Superstar  2012-06-15 21:39:35 (35 views)
• I wouldnt do that trade, but I agree with your logic  -  PNQ  2012-06-15 21:04:48 (42 views)
• I'd trade the 7+30 in heartbeat for the 14 and 16 in this draft..  -  Retired Tank Commander  2012-06-15 21:06:22 (61 views)
• I get it but cant pull the trigger.. My top guy wont be there at 14  -  PNQ  2012-06-15 21:28:47 (38 views)
• why the hell would you do that? draft who you want at 14 with the 7 then and guaranteee you get who  -  gogswarriors  2012-06-15 21:13:32 (40 views)
• dude, go do your research.   -  endlessraine  2012-06-16 00:59:12 (18 views)
• This draft is about 24 deep with a lot of pretenders at the top rungs imo. So hell ya, 7 and 30 for  -  Tom Vu  2012-06-15 21:24:19 (30 views)
• Even more pretenders the lower you go   -  New Warriors  2012-06-15 21:27:01 (21 views)
• Forget about the talent aspect  -  boxdog337  2012-06-15 23:38:01 (25 views)