In Reply to: depends how one defines successful posted by Steven on 2012-06-11 22:58:05

• IMO, Jeremy Tyler and Charles Jenkins were not successful last year. Adam gave CJ an A-....what?  -  Warriors in 2010  2012-06-11 22:40:23 (204 views)
• Both showed production + progress that would have been good were they picked in the 20's.  -  rem rehab  2012-06-12 07:40:57 (30 views)
• You're holding them to a standard that is unreasonable.  -  Captain Hindsight  2012-06-12 03:55:55 (36 views)
• CJ did well considering we were tanking.  -  San Ramon Warrior  2012-06-11 23:25:44 (55 views)
• Re: Charles Jenkins really is a Rodney Stuckey type player  -  Gee  2012-06-11 23:20:24 (62 views)
• It was odd that he was supposed to have such great scoring instincts, yet was hesitant a lot  -  Run BJM  2012-06-11 23:33:03 (49 views)
• I agree, CJ ain't all that  -  upside  2012-06-11 23:19:12 (58 views)
• the only 2nd rounders from last year who deserved A's were  -  bring back Chris Washburn  2012-06-11 23:21:52 (147 views)
• They were successful considering they were 2nd rounders.   -  small rebounder  2012-06-11 23:06:34 (18 views)
• depends how one defines successful  -  Steven  2012-06-11 22:58:05 (49 views)
• I like CJ, but to give him an "A", he needed to show he is the backup point guard this coming year.   -  Warriors in 2010  2012-06-12 00:36:01 (18 views)
• Yeah, Jeremy Tyler is a project  -  SD Warriors Fan  2012-06-11 22:53:20 (69 views)
• I'd have given him a solid B as well.   -  Warriors in 2010  2012-06-12 00:37:19 (13 views)
• Given Curry's ankle we need to have 3 PGs on the roster.   -  Run BJM  2012-06-11 22:57:38 (19 views)
• statistically he did average 9.6 apg in his last few games  -  gswfan4ever  2012-06-11 22:52:51 (52 views)