warriorsworld.net Forums: Was. He was. When he was with the Times I thought he was excellent.

contact | profile | register | prefs | faq | logout

niners | giants

Home | Donate | News

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]

Was. He was. When he was with the Times I thought he was excellent.
User account number (aid): 10295 Site Supporter
Posted by Earl j. Slick on 2008-07-06 09:25:40

In Reply to: Steinmetz is by far the most knowledgeable local writer in regards to the game of basketball... posted by leo on 2008-07-06 08:47:50

As for Hollinger, pfft. That guy tries to make all facts fit into his statistical theory, which is not knowledgeable as much as it is pedantic.

"I was duped!"

More Steinmetz: not saying it's a good thing - Inthebonus 2008-07-06 08:30:17 (589 views)

He does ignore something important - Earl j. Slick 2008-07-06 09:23:44 (133 views)

Adding Brand without adding a real PG = no playoffs once again IMO... - leo 2008-07-06 09:55:11 (37 views)

Yes, but will good FAs come here when we lack a PG? - Zeke from Cabin Creek 2008-07-06 09:52:56 (26 views)

If "Hollinger is one of the best in our business"; the business is in bad shape. - Fred Hetzel 2008-07-06 09:04:55 (22 views)

Steinmetz is by far the most knowledgeable local writer in regards to the game of basketball... - leo 2008-07-06 08:47:50 (91 views)

Was. He was. When he was with the Times I thought he was excellent. - Earl j. Slick 2008-07-06 09:25:40 (61 views)

He was better when he wasn't working for the W's - Mini-Ditkas 2008-07-06 09:00:19 (70 views)

good point....agreed. - leo 2008-07-06 09:04:02 (23 views)

I'd be happy with any of those 3 - TheMasochist 2008-07-06 08:38:23 (20 views)

Re: More Steinmetz: not saying it's a good thing - Richie Guerin 2008-07-06 08:37:46 (80 views)

You must be registered and logged in to post. Please select an option:

Login with existing account
Create a new account

[ Thread ] [ Post Followup ] [ Search Forums ] [ Warriors Forum ]